Investor Relations: provide a financial and business review of the second quarter of fiscal 2026 and the business outlook for the third quarter of fiscal 2026. Our earnings press release can be found in the investor relations section of our company website at coherent.com. I would like to remind everyone that during our conference call, we may make projections or other forward-looking
Paul: We intend that such updates will be done using a public forum such as a press release or publicly announced conference call. That can be found on the investor relations section of our website.
Jim Anderson: Thank you, Paul, and thank you, everyone, for attending today's call. As the world's leading innovator and provider of photonic technology and solutions, Coherent is at the center of an extraordinary expansion of optical networking infrastructure that's enabling tremendous growth in data traffic in the scale-across, scale-out, and scale-up networks of AI data centers. As a result of the AI build out, we saw strong revenue and profit growth in our December quarter. We also experienced another step function increase in our bookings, which we expect to increase again in our current quarter. Given the extraordinary strength and visibility of demand from our customers, combined with our continued rapid expansion and production capacity, we expect a period of sustained strong revenue growth over the coming quarters. In particular, we expect continued strong sequential revenue growth in both our March and June quarters, and we expect our fiscal 27 revenue growth rate to exceed our fiscal 26 growth rate. The key growth drivers that we see over the coming quarters are growth in both 800 gig and 1.6T transceivers, growth from the ramps of new products such as OCS and CPO solutions, and ongoing exceptionally strong demand in our products for DCI and scale across. In addition, we are now seeing demand signals that indicate a pickup in the growth of our industrial business over the course of this calendar year, led by strong orders from our semi-cap equipment customers. Overall, we're excited about the growth outlook over the coming quarters. We're also focused on driving meaningful operating leverage and expect to continue to deliver EPS growth at a significantly faster than our expected revenue growth rate. With that overview, let me provide some additional details on our recent quarter and what we expect moving forward. Turning to our Q2 operating results, revenue increased by 9% sequentially and 22% year-over-year on a pro forma basis, which excludes revenue from our recently divested aerospace and defense business. Non-GAAP gross margin expanded by 24 basis points sequentially and 77 basis points year-over-year. The combination of revenue growth and gross margin expansion drove non-GAAP EPS growth of 11% sequentially and 35% year-over-year. I'll now provide some highlights from our two operating segments. In our data center and communications segment, which now accounts for over 70% of our revenue, we saw an acceleration of our sequential growth rate with Q2 revenue growing by 11% sequentially and by 34% year-over-year, driven by strong growth in both the data center and communications markets. In our data center business, we drove a substantial acceleration in our sequential growth rate, with Q2 revenue growing 14% sequentially and 36% year over year. The acceleration of sequential growth in Q2 was driven by very strong execution from our production teams. Given the exceptional demand and our rapidly expanding capacity, we expect double-digit sequential growth in data center again in both our March and June quarters. Given that this is our largest and fastest growing business, I'd like to provide some additional details on both the demand and supply picture within our data center business. Q2 data center revenue growth was driven by growth in both 800 gig and 1.6T transceivers. In Q2, we experienced another step function increase in our data center bookings with a book-to-bill ratio that exceeded 4X as customer demand continues to increase and customers place orders further out in time, which provides us with strong visibility for the coming quarters. The strength of our product portfolio, combined with our vertical integration and our expanding US manufacturing footprint, provide a clear competitive advantage with our customers. We expect revenue growth in the current quarter to be driven by a combination of growth in both 1.60 and 800 gig transceivers, as well as growth in our OCS systems. We see strong demand for our 1.6T transceivers across multiple customers and continue to expect both 800 gig and 1.6T to grow significantly in calendar 26. We expect 1.6T to ramp significantly over the coming quarters with the early phase of the ramp driven by our EML and silicon photonics based transceivers, followed by our 200 gig Vixel based 1.6T transceivers ramping in the second half of this calendar year. On the supply side, to address the extraordinary growth in demand, we are investing in the rapid expansion of our production capacity. For example, we significantly increased our indium phosphide production capacity in Q2, and we are executing on track to our plan to double our internal indium phosphide production capacity by the fourth quarter of this calendar year. As a reminder, our indium phosphide capacity expansion is driven by our ramp of six-inch wafer production. A 6-inch wafer compared to a 3-inch wafer will produce more than four times as many chips at less than half the cost. Our production team is doing an outstanding job ramping our 6-inch indium phosphide production, and I'd like to take the opportunity to thank our team for executing ahead of our plan in Q2. We are ramping production in parallel at two sites, Sherman, Texas, and Jarfalla, Sweden. We are in production with three different types of key transceiver components on 6-inch indium phosphide. EMLs, CW lasers, and photodiodes. Our 6-inch yields continue to exceed the yields of our 3-inch production lines. In addition, we have multiple 6-inch indium phosphide substrate suppliers, and we have secured committed substrate supply that supports our expected doubling of capacity by our December quarter. In short, we are very pleased with our ramp of the world's first 6-inch indium phosphide production lines, and expect this production ramp to support significant revenue growth and margin expansion of our transceiver products over the coming quarters. We also expect to continue to supplement our internal indium phosphide capacity with continued sourcing from external suppliers. For example, EML supply from our external suppliers increased sequentially in Q2, and we expect it to increase again in the current quarter and during this calendar year through continued long-term partnership with our key external suppliers. We also continue to invest in the expansion of our transceiver module assembly capacity. We are expanding our production capacity in Malaysia, Vietnam, and other locations. Overall, I'm very pleased with the continued expansion of our production capacity to meet the rapid growth in our demand. I'm equally excited regarding our progress on other key data center products and technologies. Specifically, I want to provide updates on our CPO and OCS products which we expect to be significant contributors to our long-term growth and profitability. Transceiver technology platforms continue to evolve and we are well positioned as we continue to make progress on LPO, LRO, CPO, and MPO related products and technologies with a growing number of engagements across a wide range of customers. In particular, we recently secured an exceptionally large purchase order from a market-leading AI data center customer for a CPO solution that includes our new high-power CW laser that began sampling last year. Beyond the outstanding performance of this solution, a key factor in the customer's decision to partner with Coherent was the fact that our high-power CW laser is produced on our six-inch indium phosphide line in our Sherman, Texas facility. We expect this significant design win to generate initial revenue toward the end of this calendar year with a more significant revenue contribution next calendar year and beyond. We also have engagements across multiple other customers for both indium phosphide and 200-gig Vixel-based solutions for CPO and NPO applications. In Q2, we also saw strong progress for our optical circuit switch platform based on our differentiated non-mechanical liquid crystal technology. OCS backlog grew sequentially in Q2, and we now have over 10 customer engagements, Shipments and backlog include both 64 by 64 and 320 by 320 system sizes, with most of the backlog weighted toward the larger system size. We expect OCS revenue to grow sequentially in the current quarter and the coming quarters as we ramp production capacity as fast as possible to meet the rapidly growing demand and the over $2 billion of expected addressable market opportunity for this platform over the coming years. In our communications market, Q2 revenue grew 9% sequentially and 44% year over year. Growth continues to be driven by our products for data center interconnect and scale across, as well as strong growth in traditional telecom applications. We expect our communications business to grow sequentially in the current quarter, as well as our June quarter. The strength we are seeing in communications is broad-based in terms of both products and customers. We continue to see extremely strong demand for our products addressing the data center interconnect market opportunity. These include our ZR and ZR Plus coherent transceiver products, as well as lasers and other components that we sell to system OEMs. For example, we recently secured a significant multi-year design win with a leading DCI OEM, which utilizes Coherent's industry-first uncooled three-pin micropump solution. We're also seeing strong demand in our traditional telecom business driven by ongoing market recovery and new product introductions, such as our new award-winning multi-rail technology platform. We are also experiencing very strong demand across our broader communications product portfolio, including pumps, amplifiers, line cards, and systems. Turning to our industrial segment, revenue grew 4% sequentially and was flat year-over-year on a pro forma basis, excluding revenue from the recently divested aerospace and defense business. Sequential growth in Q2 was driven by our industrial lasers and engineered materials product lines. We expect the industrial segment to be roughly flat sequentially in the current quarter on a pro forma basis. However, looking ahead, we expect improving demand. For example, we saw a significant increase in orders in Q2 from our semi-cap customers, which we expect to translate into sequential growth for our industrial business in our June quarter and the remainder of this calendar year. At the recent Photonics West conference, we highlighted a number of compelling long-term growth areas for our industrial product lines, including data center XPU cooling solutions based on our 300-millimeter silicon carbide and thermodite technology, thermoelectric generators for improving data center energy efficiency through waste heat recovery, eczema laser annealing systems for Gen 8 OLED fabs, high-power lasers for direct fusion energy generation, and eczema lasers for for processing superconducting tape used in magnetic fusion applications. This wide range of differentiated solutions positions our industrial business for significant long-term growth. Finally, I'd like to provide an update on our portfolio optimization initiative. Last week, we completed the sale of our product division based in Munich, Germany that makes tools for materials processing. The sale of this product division is expected to be immediately accretive to both gross margin and EPS. As a result of this sale and other operational streamlining initiatives, we exited 10 sites over the past quarter, which brings the total number of sites that we've either sold or exited to 33 over the past roughly six quarters since we began this initiative. We plan to continue to streamline our footprint and exit additional underutilized and unnecessary sites over the coming quarters. In summary, we delivered strong revenue and EPS growth in Q2 and expect both fiscal 26 and fiscal 27 to be strong growth years for Coherent, given our exceptional demand from our customers and the rapid expansion of our production capacity. I'd like to thank my Coherent teammates for their strong execution and the incredible innovation that they are driving every day for our customers. I'll now turn the call over to our CFO, Sherry Luther.
Sherry Luther: Thank you, Jim. In our second quarter, we continued to drive strong double-digit year-over-year revenue growth, gross margin expansion, and strong profitability. Capital allocation continues to be an area of focus where we maintained our debt leverage ratio below two times. I will now provide a summary of our Q2 results. Second quarter revenue was a record $1.69 billion, up 7% sequentially from the first quarter and up 17% year-over-year. driven by growth in AI data center and communications demand. On a pro forma basis, excluding revenue from our aerospace and defense business, which we sold in Q1, Q2 revenue increased 9% sequentially and 22% year over year. Our Q2 non-GAAP gross margin was 39%, a 24 basis point improvement compared to the prior quarter, and a 77 basis point improvement as compared to the year-ago quarter. We continue to execute on our gross margin expansion strategy, where we generated sequential and year-over-year increases in gross margin, primarily in the data center and communications segment. These improvements were driven by reductions in product input costs, efficiency gains from improved cycle times in the manufacturing process, as well as yield improvements. Pricing optimization also continued to contribute meaningfully to our gross margin expansion. Second quarter non-GAAP operating expenses were $321 million compared to $304 million in the prior quarter and $283 million in the year-ago quarter. Operating expenses as a percentage of revenue declined to 19% as compared to 19.2% in the prior quarter and 19.7% in the year-ago quarter. SG&A expense as a percentage of revenue declined to 9.6% in Q2 as compared to 9.8% in the prior quarter and 10.2% in the year-ago quarter, due to our continued progress on driving efficiencies and greater leverage in SG&A. We have made significant progress on our ERP consolidation project, where we expect most of the company to be on a single ERP platform by the end of this fiscal year. In addition, we are executing on our low-cost region initiatives within our G&A functions that will continue to show benefits throughout this fiscal year and more meaningfully into our fiscal year 2027. The sequential and year-over-year increases in R&D were primarily in the data center and communications segment as we continue to focus on investments with the highest ROI that drive the future growth of the company. Our second quarter non-GAAP operating margin was 19.9% compared to 19.5% in the prior quarter, and 18.5 percent in the year-ago quarter. Second quarter non-GAAP earnings for diluted share was $1.29 compared to $1.16 in the prior quarter and 95 cents in the year-ago quarter. From a capital allocation perspective, we maintained our debt leverage ratio at 1.7 times down from 2.3 times in the year-ago quarter. Our capital expenditures in the second quarter were $154 million as compared to $104 million in the prior quarter and $106 million in the year-ago quarter. We are focused on supporting the exceptional customer demand in data center and communications. As a result, we are rapidly expanding our capacity and expect our capital expenditures to increase sequentially over the remainder of this fiscal year. We have made good progress in strengthening our balance sheet, including significantly reducing our debt leverage refinancing our debt and improving our working capital. With a strong balance sheet and focus on improving profitability, the company is well positioned to support the exceptional customer demand with investments to rapidly expand our production capacity. As Jim noted, at the end of last month, we closed the sale of our product division based in Munich, Germany, that makes tools for materials processing. For reference, Over the past four quarters, this business contributed average quarterly revenue of $25 million with a gross margin well below Coherent's corporate gross margin. The sale will reduce our employee headcount by approximately 425 employees. We expect to use the proceeds from the sale to reduce our interest expense by paying down debt, which will be immediately accretive to our gross margin and EPS. I will now turn to our guidance for the third quarter of fiscal 2026. Our Q3 outlook includes $5 million of revenue from the period prior to the close of the sale of the Munich product division at the end of January. We expect revenue to be between $1.7 billion and $1.84 billion. We expect non-GAAP gross margin to be between 38.5% and 40.5%. We expect total operating expenses of between $320 million and $340 million on a non-GAAP basis. We expect the tax rate for the quarter to be between 18% and 20% on a non-GAAP basis. We expect EPS of between $1.28 and $1.48 on a non-GAAP basis. In summary, I'm very pleased with the strong results in our second quarter. We remain focused on expanding profitability with disciplined execution against our long-term financial target model. We are excited about the significant growth trajectory ahead. This momentum reinforces our confidence in driving long-term growth and durable value creation for our shareholders. That concludes my formal comments. Operator, please open the call for Q&A.
Operator: Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate that your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. We ask analysts to limit themselves to one question and a follow-up so that others have an opportunity to do so as well. One moment, please, while we poll for questions. Our first question comes from Sameek Chatterjee with JPMorgan Chase & Co. Please proceed with your question.
Sameek Chatterjee: Yep. Hi. Thank you. Thanks for taking my questions. And, Jim, hope your leg is healing now. Hopefully things are better on that front. Maybe for the first question, really just on demand, how would you characterize – I mean, you gave some of the book-to-bill numbers that you're seeing, but how would you characterize the visibility there in terms of maybe duration? Like how long is the visibility – in terms of demand that the customers are providing? And vis-a-vis, how should we think about the capacity ramp for indium phosphide in particular? How are you planning that out, particularly how to think about contribution of 6-inch to that capacity ramp? And I have a follow-up. Thank you.
Jim Anderson: Yeah, thanks, Amik. And yes, the leg is doing much better. Thank you for that. I appreciate that. On the demand question, Yeah, I would say, you know, I would call the demand that we're seeing and the visibility extraordinary. If I just look at, you know, a couple highlights from last quarter, you know, if we look at our data center business, you know, I was really pleased with the acceleration of our sequential growth rate, 14% sequential growth. And then we also saw, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks over the Dan Mansoor- Over for X book to bill ratio so just seeing incredibly strong demand and we're seeing bookings go further out in time. Dan Mansoor- than we would have in the past, which is great for us for visibility so number one you know bookings being booked out. Dan Mansoor- You know, through the rest of this calendar year and most of the bookings we're getting our into calendar 27 so. Most of our calendar 26 is booked out and calendar 27 is filling very, very quickly. That's important to us because it gives us just great visibility. And then we're also getting really good detailed long-term forecasts from our big customers. A lot of times those forecasts go out two, three years. So we're getting forecasts that go out into calendar 28, which again is great for visibility. And then the third thing I would mention with respect to visibility is a number of long-term supply agreements that we've either signed with customers or in the process of signing where, you know, the LTA will provide a guarantee to our customers for a certain amount of supply in an exchange. They give us a guarantee on a certain amount of demand. And there's often some sort of financial commitment from our customers like investment for, capex, et cetera. So I would say all those things combined, the visibility of the business is the best it's ever been, which gives us just kind of great confidence in terms of the go-forward growth that we're seeing. On the second part of your question on indium phosphide capacity ramp, again, here really pleased with the team's execution here on the six-inch indium phosphide ramp. You know, one of the key metrics that I look at in terms of how the progress is how we're making progress is wafer starts. And remember our goal that we mentioned last quarter was that we wanted to double Indian phosphide capacity by the end of this calendar year. And if you look at the number of wafer starts that we're starting this quarter, we're basically at 80% of that target capacity already. So we're starting wafers at 80% of the goal of doubling capacity, which is which is really strong and frankly ahead of schedule. In fact, last quarter, we more than quadrupled the number of wafer starts from our September quarter to our December quarter. So I think that, for me, that's a really good, important leading indicator on how we're progressing on the indium phosphide ramp is that being at 80% of target in terms of initial wafer starts. Now, that's the beginning of the of the production line, right, it does take a number of quarters before those wafer starts, or a number of months before those wafer starts transition into products and ship to customers. And typical time from a wafer start to a transceiver shipment is about six months. But that's a great leading indicator on our Indian Phosphide ramp. And we're already seeing the benefits this quarter. uh, from the initial production that started in, uh, our September quarter of last year. So I'm really pleased with that, that ramp. And again, you know, the reason we're so focused on that is because six inch, a six inch wafer versus a three inch wafer is more than four times as many chips at less than half the cost. And, uh, and so we're really pleased with that ramp. And then Sammy, it sounded like you had a follow-up.
Sameek Chatterjee: Yep. Yep. Just quick. Um, OCS, I mean, um, clearly demand is strong, but any way to quantify for us what the magnitude of the backlog from the 10 customers is, or maybe in terms of material impact revenues, how should we be thinking about when does it get to maybe more than 100 million revenue number in terms of timing? Should it be this fiscal year or next year? How to think about that? Thank you.
Jim Anderson: Yeah. Thanks, Amik. Yeah. In terms of OCS, This is going to sound like a common theme, but here again, demand very strong. We are very focused on the production ramp now. So backlog is good. It grew in the December quarter versus the September quarter. We expect revenue to ramp to grow this quarter and really the revenue to ramp throughout this calendar year and into next year. And we are just 100% focused on ramping capacity and and production as fast as possible. The demand is very strong. We're engaged with over 10 customers. The size of the market has only grown since we assessed it about a year ago, and so tremendous opportunity, and we're ramping production as fast as possible. And we'll probably give some more specific milestones in terms of revenue as we progress through the year, but it will certainly contribute to our revenue growth throughout this calendar year and and certainly a contributor next year as well.
Sameek Chatterjee: All right. Great. Great.
Unknown: Thank you. Thanks for taking my questions. Thank you.
Operator: Our next question comes from Simon Leopold with Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.
Simon Leopold: Thanks very much for taking the question. The first thing I wanted to ask about was you had highlighted some progress traction on the 1.6 terabit, which is, I guess, I'd call it an emerging cycle. So maybe if you could put some milestones around that help us understand when does that cost $100 million per quarter and how does the competitive landscape stack up for that product? And then I've got a longer-term question I'll follow up with.
Jim Anderson: Yeah, thanks, Simon. So first of all, if both 800 gig and 1.6T, we expect to continue to grow for this calendar year. We saw growth in both. 800 gig of 1.60 last quarter. We expect both to grow again this quarter. You know, 800 gig is the biggest portion of revenue still. We expect that to grow on a year-over-year basis this year. 1.60 is growing much faster, but it's growing off a smaller base than 800 gig. I would say the 1.60 ramp has accelerated. The demand from the customers has accelerated. We're ramping with multiple customers. I see that as really a key main growth driver for us throughout this year. We don't typically break out revenue by data rates, but those two, 800 gig and 1.60, will absolutely be key growth drivers for the company this year, this calendar year. And 1.60 will continue to ramp into the following calendar year as well. In fact, a lot of the orders that we're seeing right now are certainly for 800 gig, but a tremendous amount of orders on 1.6T. And so that's great. That provides a great visibility in terms of the demand moving forward. And then maybe just mention what I did on the prepared remarks, which is our initial ramp is driven by both EML-based transceivers for 1.6T as well as silicon photonics. but we expect VIXL-based 1.60 transceivers to start to ramp in the second half of this year. So really pleased with the progress and the rate and pace and the growth we see ahead for 1.60.
Simon Leopold: That's good. And then I heard also you've gotten a qualification on the co-packaged optics. I'm going to ask about what happens next, which is thinking about scale-up opportunities. Are we in the timeframe yet where you're engaging customers for scale-up architectures. Maybe if you could give us some sense of how to think about that market opportunity, which I imagine may be years away, but I have to guess you're engaged in the engineering aspects already. Thank you.
Jim Anderson: Yeah, certainly. So that CPO purchase order that we received, and it was a massive purchase order, and that's for a solution based on our high-power CW laser. We're really pleased with that. That is, initially that will be deployed in scale out, but we expect that to lead to scale up deployments over time. And I would say that, you know, there is very active engagement and design wind progress on scale up, on CPO, all sorts of CPO-related solutions for scale up across multiple customers. I would call that... very active, deep engagements. On the size of the scale-up opportunity, I would say it's actually difficult to size. It is tremendous. Some of the forecasts that we've seen from our customers are very, very large. If you think about within the scale-up opportunity, all of that network today, the networks within the racks are electrical. And as those networks convert to optical networks, over the coming years, the amount of optical content that we gain in the scale-up part of the network is just tremendous, and we're very well positioned. There's a couple different ways that we expect to supply customers in that space. We can certainly supply them at the component level by providing high-power CW lasers, detectors, fiber optical cable, but we're also planning to supply those customers at a higher level as well. So, for instance, external laser sources, the pluggable laser sources that would plug into the front panel, also CPO module assemblies, et cetera. So there's a variety of ways that will support that market. But we see that as a tremendous growth opportunity in scale-up. And I wouldn't call it years out. I think it's sooner than that based on the plans that we're seeing from our customers.
Paul: Great. Thank you very much.
Operator: Our next question comes from Ruben Roy with Steeple. Please proceed with your question.
Ruben Roy: Thank you. Jim, I'd like to keep the discussion going on CPO. And it's great to hear about the large order on the timeline end of the year into next year. High level, how are you thinking about content in CPO relative to the strength you're seeing currently with 800 gig and the nascent 1.6 servit module strength? Do you think that, you know, these will – I think the consensus is that these technologies will coexist, but I'd love to get your thoughts on, you know, the content opportunity and the growth opportunities as you look out into 2027 as CPO wraps. Thank you.
Jim Anderson: Yeah, thanks, Ruben. Yeah, we really view it as it's additive. The way we think about it is, you know, pluggable transceivers will remain the dominant form factor, certainly in scale across and in the scale-out networks. through at least the rest of this decade, right? So we see very strong growth in those pluggable formats in scale across and scale out over the coming years. And what we see in CPO is CPO starting to get deployed initially in scale out, and we're seeing that. That was the purchase order that we procured, et cetera. But we believe that CPO, the big growth in CPO is actually driven by scale up. And that is... Um, that is a very tangible opportunity based on the customer engagements that we have. And that will, we believe the scale up, uh, CPO opportunity will dwarf, um, the, the opportunity in scale, scale out. Um, it will be orders of magnitude larger. And so we view that as, um, all incremental TAM for the optical industry in general. And certainly for us as well, um, since that network is a hundred percent electrical today. all of that optical content and scale-up is incremental TAM.
Ruben Roy: That's helpful. Thanks, Jim. And a quick follow-up. You talked about 800 gig versus 1.6 terabit mix. And I'm just wondering, I assume you're starting to see some demand for 200 gig and differential ENLs and that type of thing. As you think about later this year into next year and sort of the mix, What are the margin implications as you approach 40% gross margins here on the modules themselves?
Jim Anderson: Yeah, the 1.6T gross margins we expect to be higher. Generally what we see as an industry is with each new data rate, the ASPs of each new data rate go up over the prior data rate. So we expect 1.60, we're seeing 1.60 ASPs that are higher than 800 gig. And then generally, especially at the beginning of the life cycle of the data rate, the gross margins are higher. So we expect 1.60 gross margins to be higher. And so it's, we view 1.60 ramp as margin accretive for us. And then certainly, you know, also, yeah, just one other point to also factor in that is as, you know, as we ramp six inch indium phosphide capacity, which supports both 800 gig and 1.60 transceivers, that six-inch capacity is a gross margin driver for us as well in our transceiver business.
Unknown: Great. Thanks for the details, Jim.
Operator: Our next question comes from Thomas O'Malley with Barclays. Please proceed with your question.
Thomas O'Malley: Thanks for taking my question. Jim, in the preamble, you talked about a book-to-bill ratio that exceeded 4X as customer demand continues to increase, and customers are placing orders further out in time obviously a lot of really good opportunities in the data center segment, but maybe you could spend some time talking about the components of that backlog. Where is the greatest area of strength? Obviously, you have the OCS side, the module side, on the laser side, maybe spend a little time just measuring out those vectors to give us a little bit of a feel for what's contributing to most of that strength, given we're hearing from others in the industry a lot on specific numbers. I know you don't do that, but anything that you can to help us on that.
Jim Anderson: Yeah, thanks, Thomas. In terms of that book to bill last quarter, I would say the majority of that, vast majority, was driven by 800 gig and 1.60 transceiver bookings. It's a combination of, you know, growth that we expected from 800 gig, continued growth, even maybe stronger, a little bit stronger than we had expected, and then an acceleration in 1.60. So both Both 800 gig and 1.60 bookings were incredibly strong. We expect that to continue into this quarter as well. In addition to that, bookings for OCS contributed last quarter. And if I look at the current quarter and what we're expecting in bookings, we expect it to be another incredibly strong quarter in terms of bookings. And it's really a combination of those four things I mentioned, primarily 800 gig and 1.60 transceiver bookings. Over time, it starts to be more and more 1.60 bookings. And then, you know, I would say CPO and OCS as well. So those are really the main drivers within the data center bucket of bookings. The other place where we are seeing very strong bookings is in the communications business. So I would say the growth that we're seeing in DCI data center interconnect products is very, very strong. That's growing faster than our overall growth rate in communications. but we continue to see strong demand beyond DCI in the kind of traditional telecom space as well. So that would be the other place where we're seeing strong bookings.
Thomas O'Malley: Thanks, Jim. And then just as a follow-up, you talked about Indian phosphide capacity doubling by year-end. Your competitor talked about 40% increases, which they're kind of blowing through in a short period of time. It seems like the industry is bringing a lot of supply online. Broadcom's talking about some additional capacity as well. Maybe talk about When you see the industry getting the product that it needs, are we still in a position where the industry is short? And just given the incremental capacity additions, when do you think you'll be at equilibrium in that business?
Jim Anderson: Thanks. Yeah, it's a great question. It seems like every quarter we think we're going to catch up, and then the demand keeps increasing. So I don't foresee the supply-demand getting back in balance this calendar year. I don't think it happens next calendar year. And if the, if the forecast that we're seeing from customers for Indian phosphide laser, um, supply that they need for scale up, um, I, I, I think we could be in a very sustained long, uh, period of supply demand imbalance on Indian phosphide. And which is exactly why we're super focused on ramping our six inch capacity as quickly as possible. That near term goal is to double our capacity by the end of this year. But we're driving goals beyond that that are very aggressive in terms of our continued ramp of indium phosphide capacity. And the demand that we're seeing from the customers absorbs all of that capacity and then some.
Paul: Operator, if we could go on to the next question.
Operator: Our next question comes from Blaine Curtis with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.
Ezra Wiener: Hi, Ezra Wiener. I'm for Blaine. Thanks for taking my questions. Just the first one, obviously component pricing is coming up for your externally sourced components, but at the same time, you guys are signing LTAs. Can you talk a little bit about pricing and how you think about gross margins within that context?
Jim Anderson: In terms of input cost, I think you're talking about input cost to our pricing. We are seeing some higher pricing input costs with respect to externally sourced things like EMLs, but that is really offset by our internal indium phosphide ramp. I would say that the net is, you know, we're in a much better position over the coming quarters as we continue to rapidly expand our indium phosphide production capacity, and that's a gross margin benefit for us. So the net is positive for us. So we feel pretty good in terms of our position with respect to indium phosphide cost. Another way to look at it is any time the the kind of market price of indium phosphide goes up, it makes our internally sourced indium phosphide that much more valuable, right, in terms of a differential. And then, you know, I would say in terms of our own pricing, you know, we continue to see, you know, the ability to continue to optimize pricing. I think Sherry mentioned in her prepared remarks that some of our gross margin improvement last quarter was based on pricing optimization. We continue to see opportunity to optimize pricing, especially in an environment where demand is very strong. And so, you know, we believe we're in a good pricing environment across all of our businesses. And maybe, Sherry, do you want to comment any more on the effects of gross margin, or did that cover it?
Sherry Luther: Yeah, sure. Just a couple things I can add. You know, when you look at the improvement that we saw both quarter-on-quarter and sequentially in gross margin, or quarter-on-quarter year-over-year, key elements of that were certainly cost reductions where we saw lower product input costs, and the data center and communications part of our business was actually an area where we saw more of the magnitude of that benefit. We had lower product input costs for key elements, larger components of our BOM, so that was really good to see. We also had improvements in the manufacturing process that enabled greater throughput and efficiency and yield improvements. And again, that was in the data center, a part of our business. So that was really good to see as well. And then on the pricing optimization side, we actually sequentially saw even greater improvement in pricing optimization in a number of areas in our business. So these are key elements of our gross margin expansion strategy that we've rolled out as part of our strategy at our investor day last year. And we're continuing to focus on that, really pleased with the progress that we've made to date on that. And in fact, the other thing I'll add is that if you look at our 39% gross margin for this most recent quarter that we achieved, and you compare that to where our FY24 gross margin, we've actually improved our gross margin by about 470 basis points through the elements of the strategy that I've described here. So I'm really pleased with the progress. We're still, I would consider, to be in our early stages as we continue to drive toward that greater than 42% target.
Ezra Wiener: Got it. Thank you. Then for the follow-up, just wanted to ask about the six-inch ramp and kind of the timing of that and also what the long-term looks like. So how should we expect that to layer in? And longer term, do you expect the heavy majority of your capacity to be six-inch? And can you talk a little bit about the advantage of that relative to Pierce?
Jim Anderson: Yeah, on the second part of the question over the long term, yeah, essentially all of the capacity that we're adding now is six inch. We're adding a little bit of three inch, but beyond that, the vast majority is six inch capacity, and that'll continue. So over time, six inch capacity will just become more and more a bigger percentage. And if you think about us doubling capacity year over year, And almost all of that coming from six inch. The other way to think about it is by the end of this calendar year, about half of our capacity will be six inch and it'll grow from there in the following years. And in terms of the ramp progress, as I shared in terms of wafer starts, we're already at 80% of that goal to double our capacity this year. Um, we, we have plans to significantly expand it beyond, um, uh, beyond just doubling capacity in the following years. It's a little too early to talk about that, but as we get moved throughout this year, I'll get some guideposts on future years and, and the expected continued ramp of indium phosphide. And then I think you asked about, um, cost structure advantage. Uh, yeah. So the basic cost structure advantage is a six inch wafer compared to a three inch wafer. you get over four times as many product out of that wafer at less than half the cost. So it's a tremendous cost savings. And that's been a key factor in, I think, why our customers have been selecting us as well. So, for instance, that very large high-power CW purchase order that we just received, a big reason for that was because that high-power CW product laser will be manufactured on 6-inch Indium Phosphide and it will be made in Sherman, Texas, US-based manufacturing. So that's definitely something that's factoring into our customers' decisions on why to select Coherent is that advantage in 6-inch capacity and the location of it.
Unknown: Got it. Thank you very much.
Operator: Our next question comes from Papa Silo City Group. Please proceed with your question.
Papa Silo: Thank you for taking my question and congrats on the results. So Jim, I guess my first question is on indium phosphate capacity ramp as well. So anyway, you can update us at this point on the mix of your internally kind of developed indium phosphide transceivers. I believe previously you reached 50% or so. Any color on where we are at this point? And perhaps ties to that as well, do you have any targets
Jim Anderson: in mind on on longer term what kind of mix you are you are looking at yeah thanks papa what we've what we've said in the past what we've shared is that you know in the past our our amount of indium phosphide um internal versus external supply is the majority of our indium phosphide for instance lasers are supplied from internal sources and uh Now, if I look forward, I would expect just given the rapid pace of our six inch production over the coming, you know, this year and following years, I think the percentage that's internally sourced will grow over time. Now that said, you know, we expect to continue to utilize external suppliers as well. We think there's, you know, there's good reasons for that with customers and with supply chain resiliency. And so we expect to continue to utilize external sources. But over time, the internal sources will become a bigger proportion of the supply.
Papa Silo: Got it. That's helpful. And for my follow-up, it's kind of on OCS. It's very good to hear that your engagement is growing. I think it was seven now. It went up to 10 now. So it would be helpful. If you can remind us kind of the prior seven, what kind of workload would those seven engagement or kind of projects related to? And also for the additional three as well, any color on are those AI-focused or what kind of workload they are kind of related to?
Jim Anderson: Yeah, thanks, Papa. Yeah, I'll talk in terms of applications that we're seeing OCS. You know, I think initially... We were seeing OCS adoption in where OCS has historically been used, for instance, in a spine part of the network or in a redundancy type of application. As we've engaged with more customers and as we've engaged more deeply with existing customers, there's been a broadening of the applications that we're seeing for OCS. Whereas, you know, maybe initially most of the applications were in the scale out portion of the network, we're certainly seeing now applications of OCS even in the DCI portion of the network. And as we're deeply engaged with customers on their scale up plans, so optical within scale up, we're now seeing customers, you know, talking about using OCS within scale up networks as well. It's really been a broadening of not just customers but applications. And that's why, you know, when we assessed the size of this market a year ago, we assessed it at about, I think it was about $2 billion by the end of this decade. That, we likely undersized it. And if we reassessed it now, it would be well above $2 billion. So we've seen customers and applications just continue to grow.
Paul: Thank you. That's very true. Our next question comes from George Notter with Wolf Research.
Operator: Please proceed with your question.
George Notter: Hi, guys. Thanks very much. I just wanted to come back and ask about your ability to manufacture all this stuff. Obviously, the demand is quite impressive right now. I think we hit the kind of Indian phosphide discussion pretty well, but I'm just curious, like, transceiver supply in Malaysia, Vietnam. Obviously, you've got a big telecom business as well. I'd be curious on what things look like in terms of utilization rates. Do you have enough capacity? Do you need to expand capacity? And in any sense, do you look to use outsourcing as well? Thanks a lot.
Jim Anderson: Yeah, thanks, George. Yeah, so we've been more focused on updating you on Indian phosphide capacity because that's That's kind of been the constraint across the industry, and we've been constrained by that. But in parallel, we have certainly been building out capacity of, for instance, transceiver assembly and test. So I shared last quarter that within Malaysia, we opened a new facility within Malaysia, second facility in Penang, Malaysia. We also are now... planning to build transceivers at our Vietnam facilities. Vietnam already makes a number of the components that go into our transceivers. We're now starting to build transceivers within Vietnam, so that's an expansion. We've been expanding assembly and test capacity. We're also expanding, you mentioned about telecom, for our DCI and telecom products, we're also rapidly expanding capacity for that as well. Yeah, I would say really across the board, we're ramping capacity as quickly as possible. I feel like that's kind of my main job right now is ramping capacity. And so, yeah, given the strong demand that we're seeing, that's definitely a focus across the organization and across many different product lines. And then I think you asked about outsourcing as well. Yeah, we are very open to outsourcing, and we do use a number of different partners for outsourcing. And the way we always... approach it is if something provides us, if manufacturing something provides us a technical, like a technology benefit that our customers care about, or if it provides a cost structure benefit, then we'll do it in-house. But if it doesn't provide either one of those two benefits, then yes, we will look to outsource. And there's a number of places where we've historically outsourced and things that we're looking at moving forward. So, what we keep insourced is things that are technically beneficial to our products and cost structure advantage. You know, obvious example of that is six-inch indium phosphide, where we're the world's only producer of six-inch indium phosphide. So, yeah, we're certainly open to outsourcing, and we'll continue to look for opportunities to leverage outsourcing.
Paul: Super. Thanks very much. I appreciate it. Thanks, George.
Operator: Our next question comes from Carl Ackerman with BNP Paribas Asset Management. Please proceed with your question.
Carl Ackerman: Yes, thank you. Jim, thanks for more detail on the growth magnitude into 2027. But could you speak to the investments you're making today to drive growth and whether OpEx growth could grow at perhaps half of sales growth? I ask because in March I would have thought you'd see maybe less growth, more stability in OPEX from the sale of material processing business. So if you could tie that together too, that would be helpful. Can I have a follow-up, please?
Jim Anderson: Yeah, maybe I'll let Sherry talk about the OPEX growth, but maybe just a little bit of a preamble is from an OPEX standpoint, maybe from an R&D standpoint, our approach is we You know, we have a large number of businesses that have tremendous growth ahead of them, and we want to make sure we're maximizing that opportunity. And so if those businesses require R&D, we're certainly going to scale the R&D to maximize the opportunity. I think, you know, and we'll certainly scale, you know, at revenue, maybe a little bit less in revenue. But I think the big opportunity is to drive operational leverages in SG&A. And so maybe with that, I'll hand it off to Sherry to maybe provide some additional comments on that.
Sherry Luther: Sure, absolutely. Thanks for the question, Carl. So from an OPEX perspective, on the R&D front, as Jim said, I mean, we're focused on making those investments that drive the long-term growth of the company. And when you look at our year-over-year R&D growth, you see that it increased 16%. So we're definitely investing in R&D, and those areas are you know, very heavily and data center and communications part of our business because that's where we're seeing the long-term growth. And so that's very important. But on the flip side of it from an SG&A perspective, the target that we put out at our investor day for SG&A was 8% of revenue. And that is, you know, we've got a little ways to go. We've certainly made improvement. I'm really pleased with the progress that we've made on that where sequentially and year over year we are, you know, have come down in terms of the percentage of revenue. and are driving toward that target. And then, you know, on the R&D side of it, just to complete the picture, the target that we've given at our investor day was 10% of revenue. And so, you know, we're focused on making those investments. I think it's just a matter of, you know, how fast you can spend because, you know, certainly the commitment is there and we want to make sure that we make those investments. And so I'm pleased with the investments we've made to date and that's the way that we're going to continue looking at this, right? Investing in R&D, but at the same time trying to get more efficiency and and leverage out of SG&A. So that's how you can kind of think about it going forward.
Carl Ackerman: Very helpful. And for my follow-up, at SPIE, you presented several new products across your industrial portfolio, and you spoke about improving orders today in SEMICAP. Are you seeing a marked recovery across your broader industrial business, excluding SEMICAP, or is it too early to call out definitively yet? Thank you.
Jim Anderson: Yeah, good question. I would say across broader industrial, it's probably too early to call out a broad-based industrial business. recovery, but we're certainly seeing a very strong pickup in SEMICAP. So we saw strong orders in the prior quarter, in our December quarter, and we expect those orders to start to generate sequential revenue growth for us in our June quarter and through the second half of this calendar year as well. SEMICAP is a big segment for us, and so a pickup in growth in orders there is meaningful for us.
Paul: Thank you. Thanks.
Operator: Our next question comes from Ryan Kuntz with Neiman Co. Please proceed with your question.
Ryan Kuntz: Super, thank you. I wanted to ask about the comms business. You highlighted multi-rail, which I assume would be driven by some of these scale-across densifications. Jim, how are you thinking about the timing and your content there for these multi-rail density upgrades on long-haul fiber?
Jim Anderson: Yeah, thanks for asking Ryan. So first of all, we love this new multi rail product. It provides a really great ability to upgrade for service providers, network operators to upgrade kind of within their existing footprint and get essentially a lot more traffic through an existing optical infrastructure. So really pleased with this product. We think it's very distinctive in the marketplace. And we would expect the ramp to start in kind of the second half of this year. We're seeing really good design wins and orders in on this product. And revenue contribution would start in the second half of this year. And then I would say just more generally, you know, that kind of DCI portion of our business and even just the traditional telecom, we've seen really good growth there. Last quarter we saw 9% sequential growth, but it was 44% year-over-year growth. We expect that segment of communications to be sequentially up in the March quarter and the June quarter based on the strong demand that we're seeing. And here again is another place where we've seen growing backlog. And we sell at multiple different kind of levels within that part of the market. We sell at the system level, as we were just talking about. We also sell at the module level with ZR, ZR+, coherent transceivers. And then we'll sell components as well, so things like pump lasers and other products like that. And we've seen strong demand across all those product categories.
Ryan Kuntz: Great. Just to follow if I could, maybe touching on the 3D sensing market, Jim, and transition to multi-junction, how are you thinking about that transition relative to that part of the business?
Jim Anderson: Yeah, the 3D sensing, I would just reiterate what we've said before, that we won a significant new agreement with Apple that they announced as part of their American manufacturing program this past summer. And that revenue from that new partnership with Apple starts to kick in in the second half of this calendar year. It's a great multi-year partnership. We're really happy with that. You know, it's another example of a major customer leveraging our U.S. manufacturing footprint in Sherman, Texas. In the case of that business, that's 6-inch gallium arsenide that's been running in Sherman, Texas for quite a while. And so that's 6-inch gallium arsenide Vixel technology. And, yeah, big new partnership. We're really happy about that. And, you know, revenue should kick in here in the second half of this calendar year.
Ryan Kuntz: Appreciate that very much. Thanks.
Jim Anderson: Operator, I think we have time for maybe one more question. Operator?
Operator: Sure. Vivek Arya with Bank of America Securities. Please proceed with yours.
Michael Monti: Hi, this is Michael Monti. I'm from Vectaria. Thanks so much for taking our questions. To start, I just want to understand how much gross margin leverage is your six-inch Indian ball side grant providing for you right now? And as you look out over the next couple of quarters, what is the expected gross margin improvement as you are able to double supply year over year? And just bigger picture as you think about the 42% longer-term target for gross margins. Where are you staying today? What are the biggest contributors to getting there? Thank you.
Jim Anderson: Yeah, maybe I'll start with the first part of the question on Indium Phosphide, and Sherry can answer the second part sort of on broader gross margin drivers. But I would say this quarter, we're starting to see the benefits of the six-inch production this quarter, because remember we started six-inch production in the September quarter, and it usually takes roughly six months from, you know, the start of wafer production to when the products get put into a transceiver and actually shipped to customers. So we'll see a little bit of benefit this quarter, but that benefit will start to build over the coming quarters. And if you fast forward to instance for the end of this year where half of our internal capacity is running on 6-inch, you can kind of think about it as that half of our internal 6-inch capacity is roughly half the cost of the other half, right? Because 6-inch is, the cost is roughly, or the product cost is roughly half of 3-inch. So that's kind of a rough way to think about the cost-benefit. And Sherry, do you want to talk about some more general gross margin drivers?
Sherry Luther: Sure, sure. Michael, so when you look ahead to our gross margin, whether it's 39.5%, which is the midpoint of our guide for Q3, and certainly to our long-term target model of over 42%, the biggest contributors there are going to be certainly cost reductions, and that is a large bucket which includes product and input costs, some of which I talked about earlier, and we certainly saw benefits during the quarter from product and input cost reductions in our data center and communications business But that also includes yield improvements that we continue to drive and that we, you know, every quarter we're seeing benefits from yield improvements. And I'm really excited, you know, to continue to see that. There's always going to be opportunity for that. And so we're going to keep driving that as well as the lower product input costs. And the other part is going to be pricing optimization as we continue to get the value for our products. And so we've continued to see sequential improvements in the magnitude of pricing optimization. So that's really good as well. Now, the timing of these programs, it's going to differ. Some is going to be near term. Some are going to be longer term, just depending on the various initiatives. So the magnitude of the benefit in any particular quarter will likely fluctuate just because of the nature of the projects. But the other benefit certainly will also be volume. As we ship higher volume, that will benefit us as well. And then mix, there can always be headwinds from mix on a quarterly basis. So that's kind of the puts and takes within the gross margin.
Michael Monti: Great. Thank you. Very helpful. And just for my quick follow-up, as the 1.6C risk gets underway, understood that it's mainly EML and CW lasers leading the way right now, but between the two, do you see a significant shift between silicon photonics and EML in terms of what that mix looks like for 1.6C? Especially, and as you look out over the next year with CPO seemingly Getting bigger as an opportunity, does that make you rethink how much CW laser capacity you would need? Understanding there's plenty of flexibility to do both, but just curious on that shift. Thank you.
Jim Anderson: Yeah, and the first part on EML versus silicon photonics, since we have both products and we're ramping both products, it's really up to the customer on what mix they want. And it just kind of depends on the application. And so we just build whichever version is needed for the customer application. And there's not a big financial difference for us on either one of those. And we believe we're very well positioned competitively on both an EML-based 1.6E transceiver and silicon photonics. And then the second part of the question is, we're certainly ramping the antiphosphide capacity for the transceiver demand that we're seeing, but we're also on top of that ramping capacity to support the high-power CW laser demand that we've got ahead of us as well.
Paul: Thank you. Thanks, Aubrey.
Operator: We have reached the end of our question and answer session. I would now like to turn the floor back over to Jim Anderson for closing comments.
Jim Anderson: All right. Thanks, everyone, for joining today's call. We're certainly on track for another outstanding year of revenue and profit growth for our fiscal 26 and very well positioned for an even stronger fiscal 27, given the exceptional demand we're seeing and our rapidly expanding production capacity. Once again, I want to thank all of my coherent teammates for all their hard work and dedication. Operator, that concludes today's call.
Operator: You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
